Most Recent More
Diversions-
College Adviser retires, celebrates by running marathon June 19, 2013 10:05 a.m.
Discuss
Diversions-
Time to gear up for your summer adventures June 19, 2013 10:03 a.m.
Discuss
Diversions-
There’s biking trails in them there hills! June 19, 2013 10:02 a.m.
Discuss
Mariners-
M's hold off Angels, 3-2, in 10 innings June 19, 2013 9:57 a.m.
Discuss
Storm-
Storm off to better start than in 2012 June 19, 2013 9:56 a.m.
Discuss
Opinion
Letters to the editor-
Electrified fences, poison moats not the answer
Discuss
Editorials-
Internships can benefit employee and employer
Discuss
Editorials-
USPS needs Congress to level its playing field
Discuss
Letters to the editor-
Let’s look at ‘real’ scientist
2
Opinion-
Technolgy is used to snoop, not catch crooks
Discuss
- A good move. The work needs to be done and it is all tax money, so use it for a project taxpayers would eventually fund.
- City officials did a solid job of tracking expenses and met with the community about City Hall projects. The city has been open with the public. The project is a justified expense.
- It is a necessary project but the money was to be spent only on things directly related to building the new station and cleaning up the old station site. A promise is a promise.
- Not sure it needed to be done and it's a bad move politically. If City Hall needs work make a plea to voters for funding or save the cash over time.
52 total votes
Northwest
Driver arrested in death of soccer ball dribbler
Discuss
Collapsed I-5 Skagit River bridge to reopen soon, governor says
Discuss
Top Italian court faults decision to acquit Amanda Knox
Discuss
Delay sought in sentencing in Christmas-tree lighting ceremony bomb plot
Discuss
Sharp hike in projected revenue jump could break budget stalemate
Discuss
