My father taught me the line when I was a child: “A horse, a horse, my kingdom for a horse!”
William Shakespeare put those words into the mouth of King Richard III when he was unhorsed in the the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485. Richard was killed, ending the rule of the Plantagenet royalty in England and ushering in the time of the Tudors.
Shakespeare famously depicted Richard III as a hunchbacked villain who murdered members of his own family to cement his claim to the throne. Later historians have not all painted such a grim picture of Richar, but it’s fair to say that no one has made him out to be a quiet pacifist.
Richard made news in his day and now is doing so again since bones believed to be his were uncovered under a parking lot in the English city of Leicester.
Part of the evidence that the bones really are Richard’s depends on what’s called mitochondrial DNA. That’s the form of DNA that’s passed down through maternal lines, not mixed 50-50 with paternal DNA. Lazy souls like me call it “mama DNA” because mitochondrial is quite a mouthful.
There are two known living descendants of Richard III. One is a furniture maker named Michael Ibsen. He is a descendant of Richard’s sister, Anne of York, and thus he carries the “mama DNA” in question. Results of DNA analysis just completed show a high degree of match in the “mama-DNA” of the bones and that of Ibsen.
Ibsen evidently has quite a bit to adjust to these days.
“I never thought I’d be a match,” he told CNN.
There is other evidence that the bones are really those of Richard III. The remains show wounds consistent with the battle blows thought to have ended Richard’s life. And the remains were found at what once had been Greyfriars friary. The exact location of the grave had been lost to history, but it makes sense the body would have been buried on ground belonging at the time to the Church.
Richard III didn’t get a lot of respect after his death. Jo Appleby, one of the experts on the exhumation team, said that there are signs Richard’s body was mistreated after he died, including evidence of “humiliation injuries.”
Before the DNA work was completed other lines of evidence were followed up. According to The New York Times, radiocarbon dating of two rib bones from the skeleton indicated they belonged to an individual who had died between 1455 and 1540. That fits with the historical date of Richard’s death in August of 1485.
Lots of lines of evidence fit with the idea that the bones discovered under the parking lot are those of King Richard III. But it’s the “mama-DNA” that clinches the case.
Let’s hear it for mothers everywhere.
E. Kirsten Peters, Ph.D., is a rural Northwest native who trained as a geologist. This column is a service of the College of Agricultural, Human and Natural Resource Sciences at Washington State University.