State must meet obligation to fully fund schools

Advertisement

Ask yourself what matters more, your children’s education or their health care?

Now ask yourself what matters more, getting a good education for your children, being able to get good health care for them or keeping a handful of tax loopholes for special interests?

The first question is one we shouldn’t have to answer. But we will if the Legislature doesn’t answer the second question correctly.

In 2012, the Washington state Supreme Court’s McCleary decision delivered in clear terms a message Washington families have long wanted our state government to hear — educating our children is the state’s paramount duty. The court was clear that the state is failing our kids, and instructed lawmakers to find “stable and sustainable” funding for the education of every child in our state.

The court’s ruling doesn’t apply to just some children, or certain school districts — it says that every child is entitled to a good education. That means we need to make sure kids from every background and every part of the state have an equal chance to learn and succeed.

Having access to a quality education is a fundamental civil right, like free speech or being able to vote. The state has a moral and legal obligation to protect that right. That means the Legislature must provide enough funding to make sure all children have the opportunity to receive a quality education.

To their credit, legislators in Olympia along with the Gov. Jay Inslee have been working to fulfill the Supreme Court’s call to action and find a way to fully fund education.

Legislators from different political perspectives have offered sincere ideas for strengthening our schools.

But offering ideas is not the same as offering realistic solutions. As citizens of Washington, we have a right to expect education will be fully funded.

But we also must deal with the reality that neither the Legislature nor most Washingtonians will support a budget that eliminates funding for critical services or relies on one-time fixes to increase education funding for a year or two while ignoring the “sustainable” requirement put forth by the court.

When asked to choose between schools or health care for their children, most Washingtonians will choose both. So the Legislature has to be realistic in answering the second question — with our schools in a funding crisis and a state budget already stretched thin, hundreds of millions in tax loopholes for special interests are hard to justify.

Gov. Inslee and the House budget writers have identified a slate of tax loopholes that, when closed, will provide a significant portion of the funding needed to meet the state’s paramount duty. Many of these 650 special-interest tax breaks are either outdated or of questionable value.

There is no question about the value generated by improving the quality of the education we offer our children. For almost four months leaders in Olympia have looked for ways to fund education and debated the possibilities.

The special session has started and the time for debate is over. It is time to act decisively and meet our obligation to current and future generations.

Our children have a right to a quality education and the legislature needs to make real and measured progress in finding funding for McCleary.

Parents, teachers, education support professionals, principals, school administrators and school boards across the state are united in urging the Legislature to comply with the McCleary decision and fully fund the public education all students deserve.

This column was written by Hillary Hunt, legislative assistant at the Washington Education Association.

The content was reviewed and endorsed by Margo Piver, school librarian at Prospect Point Elementary and president of the Walla Walla Valley Education Association, Dayton Elementary School Principal Katherine Leid, Pasco School District Superintendent Saundra Hill, Walla Walla School Board member Cindy Meyer and Walla Walla School District Superintendent Mick Miller.

Comments

grammaphyllis 1 year, 6 months ago

Define "Fully Funded"

This concept is as difficult to get your mind around as the idea that a single parent with several little children, on welfare, and WIC, and Food Stamps, and subsidized housing, and discounted public transportation pass, demands to be "Fully Funded" in their quest to cover their costs for legalized Marijuana.

The people who wrote, reviewed and endorsed this article have a vested interest in increasing the flow of funds to the education system without showing concrete evidence of needs that are unmet. In Walla Walla, the School District does a great job.

Check your tax bill and see the percentage of your taxes going to education on a State and local level. Then look at the amount you pay for the "Excess Levy" that provides millions for the "slush fund" for the District to operate activities and fill in the gaps where they think special activities should be provided.

Lets take a look at all the Checks, ( also known as Warrants) the Districk has issued for all expenditures and make an analysis whether they are in compliance with common sense decisions or just someone's wild idea that "this is going to be fun".

Think of this as you consider New Taxes like the Levy the School District will push for in the near future. Might even want to think about it when considering a new bond issue, etc, etc.

Define " Fully Funded"

0

Sign in to comment

Click here to sign in