Wall Street sees Bitcoin’s legacy as payment system

The Bitcoin network works outside the banking system.


NEW YORK — While a Texas Senate candidate is accepting Bitcoin campaign donations, and Overstock.com customers can use the technology to buy engagement rings, Wall Street sees its future as a more of a payment system, rather than a currency.

Either way, it’s been a profitable investment. Created in 2008, Bitcoin’s value took off last year, leaping about 60-fold in the past 12 months to $936.51 Wednesday, with prices ranging from $16 to more than $1,200, according to bitcoincharts.com. Gold plunged 26 percent, while the second best-performing major currency, the 18-nation euro, climbed 7.3 percent.

While its supporters have embraced Bitcoin as an alternative to currencies vulnerable to sovereign debasement, China’s central bank has banned lenders from handling the virtual money and Finland’s authorities said it lacks the characteristics of a real currency. Citigroup, the second- largest foreign-exchange trader, said Bitcoin could benefit society if it eases transactions, even though about 1 percent of owners hold some 80 percent of the digital money.

“Bitcoin, in essence, is just an evolution of a payment system,” Sebastien Galy, a New York-based senior foreign- exchange strategist at Societe Generale, said by phone. “The ultimate concept of transaction, the innovation, is certainly progress in the means of transaction.”

Bitcoin was introduced by Satoshi Nakamoto, which may be a pseudonym for one or more programmers. The anonymous network is protected by cryptographic codes and works outside the banking system, allowing users to transact with one another directly. It doesn’t exist in physical form and has no coins or bills.

“The original Bitcoin was designed to operate outside the financial system,” Steven Englander, the head of currency trading for major industrialized nations at Citigroup in New York, said by email. “There is nothing to stop existing payments processors from adopting generic Bitcoin payments technology.”

Bitcoin’s market value has expanded to $10.6 billion. The supply will be capped at 21 million, with about half of that already in circulation, according to Bitcoin.org, a repository for information on the system. The price of an individual Bitcoin jumped from $100 in July, to $200 in October and more than $1,000 this month.

For Offit Capital Advisors, this volatility could be its fatal flaw. “Saying that a currency is a store of value implies that it is a relatively stable value,” the New York-based private wealth-management firm wrote in a report. “Without that stability, the costs of normal commerce far outstrip any credit-card or bank transaction fees. Bitcoin fails miserably on this important measure.”

Bitcoin is less a currency than a virtual commodity, Sheng Songcheng, the head of the People’s Bank of China’s statistics department, said last week. The Bank of Finland said on its website that the virtual money doesn’t fulfill official definitions of a currency.

The Internal Revenue Service hasn’t offered guidance on Bitcoin beyond saying it’s working on the issue and has been monitoring digital currencies and transactions since 2007. The IRS should give taxpayers clear rules on how it will handle transactions involving digital currencies, Nina Olson, the National Taxpayer Advocate, said Jan. 9.

Bitcoin is gaining traction in the face of the official criticism. The virtual money is being accepted for donations by Texas Senate candidate Steve Stockman. Online retailer Overstock.com’s Chief Executive Office Patrick Byrne said in a Jan. 9 statement that he finds the virtual currency appealing to him because “no government mandarin can will it into existence.”

The value of the world’s reserve currencies has been called into question since the 2008 financial crisis, spurring demand for everything from gold and art to digital money. The response of central banks of flooding the financial system with unprecedented amounts of cheap funding debased their currencies, helping send the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index tumbling 20 percent from March 2009 to August 2011.

“There is definitely a temptation to find assets that are in limited supply,” Eswar Prasad, a professor at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., and former International Monetary Fund economist, said Jan. 14. Investors have sought Bitcoin “on the belief that assets in limited supply are likely to maintain their value more than assets that can be produced at the whim of a central authority.”

The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet has quadrupled to more than $4 trillion since 2008 as it sought to drive down interest rates and prop up asset prices. Japan is doubling its money supply to ward off 15 years of deflation. The European Central Bank holds 2.2 trillion euros ($3 trillion) of assets, down from 3.1 trillion euros in June 2012.

As recently as 2012, ECB President Mario Draghi was forced to battle speculation that the currency union would unravel. He warned markets he’d do “whatever it takes” to protect the euro, which survived to welcome Latvia as its 18th member on Jan. 1.

Some companies that accept Bitcoin for payment have avoided price volatility by using a third party. Consumers can buy a $58.49 Beautyrest mattress topper from Overstock.com using Bitcoin. The payment is processed by Coinbase, which eliminates foreign-exchange risk for the retailer and provides local currency to Overstock.

“Most businesses that accept Bitcoin do not hold it,” Citigroup’s Englander said. “So they’re now using it simply for transactions and not as an asset.”

Bitcoin the currency can’t be separated from Bitcoin the payment system, Barry Silbert, the founder and head of SecondMarket Inc., a New York brokerage that runs a virtual currency fund, said Jan. 14. Without having the virtual currency as an asset, the system would be reliant on trust in a third-party, he said. His fund invests in Bitcoin.

“There is very little debate, I think now in Wall Street, and certainly as it relates to Silicon Valley and venture capital, that Bitcoin technology, Bitcoin the protocol, has the potential to radically disrupt and transform the financial- services space,” Silbert said.

Trust in traditional currencies hasn’t evaporated if their performance since the height of the financial crisis is anything to go by.

“The crisis has paradoxically shown that it’s those assets that can be produced in very large quantities in a short period that are the ones that continue to retain the trust of the broad majority of investors,” Cornell’s Prasad said.


Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment

Click here to sign in