Layoffs that unnecessarily damage children’s education must be avoided
It is the responsibility of school superintendents to evaluate their districts’ teachers and needs.
WALLA WALLA UNION-BULLETIN
More 'Editorials'
- Congress plays games while nation suffers
- Homeless need training, support not Bill of Rights
- Whooping cough epidemic: Prevention, not panic, needed
- Partnership between DSHS, universities is good move
- New governor must be realistic about funding education
- Why conduct school choice experiment without collecting data?
- Commissioners wise to delay lifting salary freeze for county elected officials
In another place, and in another time, I personally have seen this problem affecting students. The other issue that was entangled with that one was that districts seemed more willing to send teachers to the house than they were to cut administrative positions. In one case there was a reclassification of personnel to change the appearance of the ratios.
It makes no sense whatsoever to eliminate enthusiastic, well prepared teachers in favor of teachers very close to retirement. Instead, offer incentives for the latter to retire a year or so early so that the districts have expeienced, well prepared, enthusiastic teachers still on board after they retire. Our children's education shouldn't be negotiable nor should it be a function of politics.
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Walla Walla Valley. Comment writers should refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks, and comments should be free of any personally identifiable information, such as e-mail addresses, mailing addresses and phone numbers. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by the comment.
Registered User?

RSS
E-mail
Print
Comments

