Jump to content
Did I calculate this correct? We have spent over $80,000 on the recent and up-coming elections? This seems to be a lot money spent on trying to convince us voters that they are financially capable of using our money..........
While it is obvious that some of these costs were needed, couldnt they do a little planning ,combining and use some of this money towards doing a little upkeep on a School?
Just seems excessive. It is obvious that the UB seems it to be too, as the way they worded this article.
Thanks. I thought it was already allocated taxes.... Sorry for the confusion.
So, am I correct? (using your figures) There is $659,337 in taxes earmarked for the building already? Where are these funds coming from? Are they reducing the funding from other areas, i.e. sports, math, P.E. etc? What happens to these monies if this project fails? And if these monies were taken from other areas, I question why it was going to those projects already.......
Also, is this a already parking lot rebuilt or a truly new lot?
Since you live in CP, none of your tax money was used to fund the raises or the aviary.
Actually Father of 5....
Some of us didn't want ANY bond until we pay some bills (bonds) off first and see how CP student loss impacts us. We voted and I had hoped that they listened. Boy, was I wrong....
And here we are again...... While I am more understanding with this version (compared to last one), I am a more than a little disappointed in the board, by pushing any bond again so soon! They didn't hear us, I guess! They just think they need our money at all costs!
Also, how do you purpose we contact our board? We have voiced our concerns at meetings, we have wrote letters to the U-B, we voted accordingly and yet they don't seem to listen to us... (it sounds like they don't really want to listen to their own advisory task force, either), it is more than disappointing.
It seems it is going to take a couple of elections to get the board to slow down a little.
This idea would get my vote
RE: Downhiller.... She does not want to add to the conversation at all, she just wants to make sure NamVet does not contribute either!
Please vote on this subject on the main homepage of the U-B.
Wow.............. Who didn't see this coming............
She needs to be tried, and if convicted sentenced to all that is coming to her under the law, not a plea deal!
If you have feelings about this idea, please go to the U-B home page and scroll down to the question/poll on this subject and vote.
Last login: yesterday
2013 Best Of The Best Winners
The latest wine and dine news.
The Valley's people, wine & food.
Find your way around the Valley.
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2014 Union-Bulletin. All rights reserved.