Jump to content
That's actually a very good idea. Since the Sheriff's Office is letting their insurance company defend the case, they've probably already decided to settle out of court, meaning that he will get some money. His victims should get first shot at it. I have some other opinions, but am posting them elsewhere on this thread.
I haven't been involved in Oxford House for some time, but lived in one in Tri-Cities for about two years after I got out of rehab, and credit much of my success at remaining sober long-term to the organization. At that time, the expense share members paid was based on a formula that tried to make it affordable for those on fixed incomes and minimum wage workers, usually $300-350 monthly. At that time, most people who got out of treatment in Washington were able to get GAU for 3-6 months at $397 per month, but I understand that's no longer available. Women with children are probably able to get TANF until they can find jobs. It's one of the things that make getting back into society so difficult for those who have been on the streets or in the criminal justice system. Once one has a criminal record, it's very hard to find a job or a place to live. At least the Oxford House will give someone a place to live. Finding a job, however, is still a struggle.
Statistics show that when cops wear body cams, or use dashboard cams all the time, such 'use of force' lawsuits go down to almost nothing. Better behavior by the police? Or fewer frivolous lawsuits when people know they can't win them? My guess is a combination of both.
Absolutely! The churches and the "religious" who own billion-dollar businesses, thanks to their huge tax exemptions, want to have their cake and eat it too. Do you know one simple change in the law that would end our deficit TODAY and put our nation back in black? Simple. That would be to stop allowing religious "businesses" to play by a different set of rules than everybody else. If you're making a profit, in this country, great! But then you don't get to get out of paying your fair share because of your "beliefs." Besides, it's always about controlling the bodies of women. They don't have a problem with paying for the Viagra their male employees purchase, in droves, which serves NO medical purpose whatsoever. It's ONLY reason for existing is so that old guys who God has decided don't need to have erections any more can get around God's will. But no, when it comes to women being able to plan their families, get out and stay out of marital and child-bearing bondage, then it's all about "god's will." Cry me a river...
True parity will not come until there is no need to make such announcements at all. That a person is gay will no longer be newsworthy. However, the extreme-right wing in this country has joined forces with the corporotocracy, who recognize that a population of TV-raised consumers with no critical thinking skills are much easier to subjugate and control than an educated, aware citizenry who can and do ask questions and speak truth to power. Thus, those such as the Koch brothers, the Walton family, and Wall $treet will continue to buy and oversee one entire political party in this country, and far too much of the other. Our corrupt campaign finance system, backed by a population that only cares that "Dancing with the Stars" and "Duck Dynasty" appear on their televisions at the proper time, ensures that those who get into powerful positions come into that power pre-bought and paid for. Thus, I fully expect that it is equally possible that America will become a theocracy in fact if not in name much sooner than our GLBT brothers and sisters achieve true equality.
There are only two true human emotions, love and fear. When a human being kills, at the bottom of the rage, hatred, or whatever it appears to be the motivation, underneath that is fear. Why is there so much more fear and it's manifestations of rage, anger, bigotry, racism, sexism, xenophobia, and the rest of the negative 'causes' for murder than ever before? The question is complicated and the answer is even more complex. I'm only going to talk about the gang issue here, but it's hardly the only, or even the biggest, source of violence in our country. In the Walla Walla area, however, I think that it is the biggest source of violent crime.
Gang life is one that revolves around fear and revenge for slights, either real or imagined. First, we must end the gang takeover of our town, however that has to be done. The fact that drive-by shootings and gang fights in which people are stabbed or shot result in 30-day jail sentences where non-violent drug possession results in decades of incarceration is one way we show dramatically where our priorities lie. Violence toward another being, including animals, should result in prison-period. No plea bargaining it down to a few days in jail or a fine. And since violence is an indication of a troubled person, perhaps a mentally ill one, effective treatment for anger issues and the need for love that results in children joining gangs in the first place need to be in place both within the adult and juvenile prison systems, as well as in the community, when children might possibly be young enough to be turned from gang membership as a path to belonging.
Personally I'm as left-wing politically as one can be, but the right has the correct answer to the most fundamental problem that causes gang membership, fragmented families and young girls having babies without a father in the picture. It's too bad that everyone is so blinded by their political worldview that we can't work together to address this without attacking one another. Surely we can all agree that children need two stable parents and a functional family in which to raise healthy children, at least. We're going to disagree on how to implement that, but shouldn't we all agree on that much? Gangs form a surrogate family for children without a functional biological one, and without male role models and stable home lives, boys are going to continue to be attracted into gangs.
Great letter! Those of you like the first reply to this letter are so blinded by the lies and bigotry that spews out of right-wing hate media and your own obvious racism are going to be left behind in the dirt as the nation moves on. No American president in history has had to tolerate the abuse, insults, and obstruction of his policies that this one has. And why? Other, of course, than the fact that the media power-brokers such as faux and AM Hate Radio have become so powerful and so adept at propaganda and jingoism that they can't stand the fact that their favored candidate for president was defeated by a landslide. The only other reason is simple racism and xenophobia. Period. And the pool of citizens who are willing to be so blatant in their white supremacist beliefs is dying. Younger Americans could care less if our President is black, Hispanic, female, gay, or atheist. They simply want a government that works and one that hasn't already sold its' soul to the corporate entities that so desire to be the true rulers of what was once a democracy "by, for, and of the people."
ANYTHING coming from Breitbart needs fact-checking and correcting. If you are trying to convince anybody posting here that you have pertinent facts based in reality, sending us to Breitbart.com is not the way to do it!
Thank you for your wise letter! Science and spirit are NOT at odds with each other. In fact, the more that science shows us about the complexity and glory of the cosmos, the surer I am that we, and everything in that cosmos, are interconnected in a great consciousness that those of a religious bent refer to as "God." The science-deniers are using books written thousands of years ago by primitive goat-herders who understood absolutely nothing about the world they inhabited to confuse, terrorize, and manipulate the masses who look up to them into following their orders blindly. Unfortunately, too many Americans have been brainwashed by the media, religious and political "leaders" with their own agendas, and their own laziness about studying to find personal answers to their questions, into robotic followers of whomever attracts their attention for the moment. Becoming educated is hard, and it takes work. For many, it's easier just to let someone else "find" the answers to the difficult questions. Of course, in return they have to shut their own minds down and blindly follow those so-called "leaders" down a path that will end in the extinction of most life upon the only planet we have to support us.
This is an area where state law trumps federal law. States are not compelled by federal law to include gender orientation as a protected class, and some don't. Washington, in my opinion fortunately, has made that decision, and while I do have some mixed feelings about a florist and a wedding not being the same as a lunch counter, I agree with the law.
I think the person who called Hewitt's office had a very good question: What about rural areas where, without a law requiring service to gays and lesbians, there quite literally might not be anywhere they could eat, shop, rent an apartment, buy a home, or get a job? Walla Walla's not quite that intolerant, but I've lived in slightly more rural parts of eastern Washington, and most of northern Idaho, where that is absolutely a possibility. In very small towns, like perhaps Pomeroy and places north of Clarkston, all community life revolves around the churches, most of which are extremely fundamentalist. Even if people wanted to say, offer a job to someone openly gay---or just that they perceived as gay---the rest of the community would approach that person or business and tell them something to the effect: "We really don't want "those people" here, and if you give them a job, let them open a bank account, (fill in the blank) then they might stay. So better just not to." Usually part of the spiel includes "I'm not prejudiced but..." and then the name of jay-sus is brought into the picture as well as a warning that allowing "one of them" will open the floodgates to an uncontrollable horde.
For those of you who didn't live in this area a generation ago, or haven't had to cod freeze-out that a rural area can give to a person who belongs to a "group" they don't like, this was quite common that long ago, not just to gays and lesbians, but to non-whites, non-Anglos, and non-christians. Would that all have changed without the discrimination laws? Maybe eventually, but it would have taken much longer, and there would still be little towns in parts of the state where gay people feared for their life, as they still do in many parts of the south, Texas, and other places where religion is used to justify far worse things than refusing to do flowers for a gay wedding.
It's the camel and tent phenomenon: Giving someone permission to refuse to do business with a selected group, especially adding religiosity into the mix is the camel's nose, and hanging people on fences to die is his tail.
Last login: Monday, November 17, 2014
2015 Best Of The Best Winners
The latest wine and dine news.
The Valley's people, wine & food.
Find your way around the Valley.
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2015 Union-Bulletin, 112 S. First Ave., Walla Walla, WA 99362/509-525-3300. All rights reserved.