Jump to content
It seems that the last two paragraphs says it all. Instead of more legislation and regulation why not just enforce the laws, legislation and regulation already on the books?
Will freedom survive?
Thank you and have a nice day.
If your taking the letter in the context of propulsion and what the writer is saying it definitely makes sense. But obviously the comment is just to denigrate the person without much input on the subject itself?
Would clarify please - are you calling persons with a different mindset than yours trolls or are you allowing everyone to expound on their own beliefs. If its just a difference of opinion your posting is confusing.
Wrap it all up in a nutshell and it's all good.
This is one of the best acts of kindness that the U-B has had to print in quite some time. Kudos to Home Depot.
Your first 2 paragraphs are purely myth. A prime example would be when the Democrats pushed through the Presidents signature legislation with the House Majority Speakers quote "We have to pass the bill so we can find out whats in it". Kinda like "sign a blank check and trust me"? Well we have been finding out for the last 4 years the downfalls of this legislation and it is not over yet.
In regards to your last paragraph the statement is rather mind-boggling (especially your reference to conservatives) due to the fact that it has been proven that Democrats outspend Republicans by a margin of 3 to 2 and most of the time 2 to 1. How about the campaigning President in Hollywood and taking in millions in one dinner at $32,000/a plate? I would prefer that politicians be limited to minimal amounts of money to travel in there district and not except outside money which often happens in these larger districts. If there is so much money to be donated put it to something useful such as upgrades to a High School?
Do these students receive credits towards political science for being put on the streets to campaign?
Steve - it is really hard to be civil when you have ignorance trailing you around at every move with nothing to add to the discussion.
Sorry I didn't mean to leave the comment at that. If you recall from 2007-2009 the majority of the House and Senate was held by a single party. At that time then Senator Obama voted yah or present on all legislation that was passed. From 2009-2011 all three - House, Senate & Presidency) was held by a single party. Since that time the Senate & the Presidency has been held by a single party. Not understanding how that one party can upset the whole applecart with the Senate Majority leader stifling all legislation that tries to go forward?
Last login: today
2014 Best Of The Best Winners
The latest wine and dine news.
The Valley's people, wine & food.
Find your way around the Valley.
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2014 Union-Bulletin. All rights reserved.