Jump to content
You meant to say "things" and "affected"...?
Pearl, what do you mean by "...$40 million people..." or is it that your spelling is not that good either? Look at the lumber in your eye first, my estimata amica! Or is it that you've not read Mathew 7:3. Read it, It might help softening your heart too!
I believe that, based on common sense, if other, not as rich countries as ours can cover ALL of their citizens (with better outcomes than ours) we, the riches nation in the world can do it too.
But if poeple like you keep supporting corrupt polititians who favor and help big insurance and pharmaceutical companies in defrauding the government we will keep getting what we've been getting, exempli gratia, poor medicine (or none at all) for the poor and indigent. But you and the "compasionate conservatives" of the world just don't give a darn.
Pearl, I've been watching your so call logical thinking, and it goes like this: if is head I win, if is tail you lose! And you always win, 100% of the times. ATTAGIRL!
As for your spelling, as painfully carefull as you are, you're far from perfect, my amica...just check your previous postings.
As for your "illusions" I really suggest you check the meaning of "projection" as a defense mechanism. If such habitual projections of yours help you in going through your day, by all means keep doing it.
That's all for today.
Cathy is a selfish politician, only interested in her political carrer. Her office never answers or returns calls. She is driven by the tea party, hysterical mentality, and does not represent the majority of her republican constituency. Let's vote her out ASAP!
Did you find a less bad option? Are you sure Obamacare double your premiums? Pearl, you should try again as it does not make any sense! You have the right to hate Obamacre but I bet you love Social Security benefits, Medicare, the protection from the Police, firefighters, safe roads, etc, etc. But if you want all government services tax free, that's a different story. Do you have any ideas as to where to go for a government free Country? Somalia comes close, indeed.
Your answer is in keeping with the "conspiracy" conservative mentality. Malice is seen in any government activity, regardless. Saving millions at the expense of furloughed federal workers, the majority of them veterans? There goes the "compassionate conservative" mentality down the toilet!
We need to vote Cathy out of office ASAP!
Kfarrens, you're right, I have not read the full initiative, but I will soon. Regardless, my point about adding a few words to the current label with the idea of expanding on the information about the "content" of the product ought not be a bad one.
I have great respect for farmers as my grandfather, my sister and uncles own coffee farms in Puerto Rico. As an adolencent I earned a few dollars working on the plantations to pay for college. I never saw a label on anything until many years later. Now, as a consumer, I appreciate all the information I can get a hold of! Therefor, I'd love to accept your gentile invitation to visit your farm. I'm sure I'll learn quite a bit from the real deal!
My understanding is that all products must have labels. It does not cost that much to add a few words to the current label saying that such product contains this or that ingredient. As Mr. Osterman pointed, it's a matter of choice for an informed customer to purchase the product or not. But if Monsanto and DuPont ( hardky small food producers) are afraid to give that choice, that's another issue. On the other hand it could be irrelevant, for example, to label Tabasco as "hot" unless you suffer from indigestion or hemorroids. Any way Tabasco is so delicious, mostly in a good pozole, that nobody cares, one way or the other. There!
Last login: Wednesday, November 20, 2013
2013 Best Of The Best Winners
The latest wine and dine news.
The Valley's people, wine & food.
Find your way around the Valley.
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2013 Union-Bulletin. All rights reserved.